Whiz TutoringWhiz TutoringWhiz Tutoring
Seattle, Washington -United States
+1 (234) 253-4320
Whiz TutoringWhiz TutoringWhiz Tutoring

Systematic Review and Integrated Review: Differences Explained

Systematic Review vs. Integrated Review

In academic research, understanding the difference between a Systematic Review and Integrated Review is fundamental. This expanded guide dives deeper into these distinctions, clarifying their unique attributes for students and professionals involved in research and data analysis.

Defining a Systematic Review

A Systematic Review is a highly structured form of research synthesis. It is characterized by a methodical and comprehensive literature search focused on a specific research question. The process involves systematic data extraction, rigorous analysis, and the synthesis of findings from selected studies. This review type is particularly prevalent in healthcare and scientific research.

Understanding an Integrated Review

An Integrated Review, in contrast, adopts a more encompassing approach. It integrates findings from both qualitative and quantitative research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a topic or issue. This review type is versatile, accommodating a broader range of research questions and study designs.

Purpose and Scope: Specific vs. Broad

The key difference in purpose and scope between these two reviews is their focus. Systematic Reviews typically aim to answer precise questions, often related to the effectiveness of interventions or treatments. Integrated Reviews, however, have a broader scope, aiming to synthesize a wide array of research including theoretical and empirical work.

Methodological Approach: Rigorous vs. Holistic

In methodology, Systematic Reviews are known for their strict and predefined protocols, demanding precise inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies. Integrated Reviews, meanwhile, offer a more holistic approach, accommodating diverse research methodologies including theoretical analyses and qualitative studies.

Data Analysis: Quantitative Focus vs. Mixed Methods

Systematic Reviews predominantly analyze quantitative data, focusing on measurable and empirical outcomes. In contrast, Integrated Reviews employ mixed-method analyses, valuing both quantitative and qualitative data, which allows for a richer, more layered understanding of the topic.

The Role of Qualitative Research

A major distinguishing factor is the role of qualitative research. Systematic Reviews typically exclude qualitative studies due to their quantitative focus, while Integrated Reviews embrace qualitative insights to offer a more nuanced perspective on the research topic.

Get in touch for personalized research assistance and tutoring

Applications in Various Fields

These reviews find different applications based on their characteristics. Systematic Reviews are commonly used in fields like medicine and science, particularly for informing evidence-based practice. Integrated Reviews are more versatile, being utilized in social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary studies to address complex issues.

Outcome Orientation: Precision vs. Breadth

The outcomes of these reviews are markedly different. Systematic Reviews usually provide precise, data-driven conclusions, whereas Integrated Reviews offer comprehensive insights that incorporate a variety of perspectives and research methods.

Process and Time Considerations

The process of conducting these reviews also differs significantly. Systematic Reviews, due to their rigorous nature, can be more time-consuming and require a clear, systematic approach to literature search and data analysis. Integrated Reviews, while still demanding, offer more flexibility in terms of methodology and timeline.

Impact on Research and Practice

The impact of these reviews extends to both research and practice. Systematic Reviews are crucial in fields where concrete, evidence-based recommendations are needed. Integrated Reviews, with their broader perspectives, are invaluable in shaping policy and practice in areas where diverse viewpoints are essential.

Skill Set and Training

Performing these reviews requires different skill sets. Conducting a Systematic Review demands skills in detailed data analysis and familiarity with specific methodologies. Integrated Reviews, on the other hand, require a broader understanding of various research methods and the ability to synthesize diverse types of data.


Distinguishing between Systematic Review and Integrated Review is key in the field of research and analysis. Each review type has its unique strengths and applications. Understanding these differences enables researchers, students, and professionals to choose the appropriate review type for their specific research needs, ensuring effective and relevant outcomes.

Leave A Comment